화웨이의 음성비서
일전에 말씀을 드린 바와 같이 삼성전자에서는 빅스비
아마존에서는 알렉사
구글에서는 구글 어시스턴트 가 활성화되거나 될 예정입니다.
- 중국 같은 경우에는 구글이 들 어 올 수 없기 때문에
화웨이가 자체적으로 음성 비서를 선보일 것이라는 소식이 블룸버그를 통해 전달됐습니다.
특히 구글 안드로이드 운영체제 와 구글서비스를 차단되었기 때문에
화웨이가 중국에서 중요한 역할을 할 것으로 보입니다
- 화웨이의 미국 전략단말에는알렉사가 탑재할 것으로 예상됩니다.
관련링크:
포털업계의 AI 서비스 개발에 총력을 기울이고 있습니다.
'[TS] 일상다반사' 카테고리의 다른 글
| 임차인의 배당요구와 임대차의 종료여부 (0) | 2017.02.26 |
|---|---|
| 임차주택의 경매 시 기간만료 전 임차인의 배당요구권 (0) | 2017.02.26 |
| 주커버그가 꿈꾸는 새로운 미래 (0) | 2017.02.20 |
| 구글에서 인터넷 풍선을 띄웁니다. (0) | 2017.02.20 |
| 국내 동영상 광고시장 구글, 페이스북이 독점 (0) | 2017.02.20 |
주커버그가 꿈꾸는 새로운 미래
페이스 북은 새로 태어나야 한다 주커버그의 말인데요,
주커버그는 페이스 북 최고경영자입니다.
월스트리트 저널 에 따르면
페이스 북이 주커버그가 페이스북을 재정립할 구상을 가지고 있다고 보고 했습니다
주커버그가 페이스 북에 올린 글에 따르면,
페이스 북이 만들어야 돼 세상은 더 잘 연결 해야 하는 세상이라고 언급 했습니다.
온 오프라인에 커뮤니티 구성
안정과 긴급 대응을 위한 온오프라인 마련
뉴스의 다양한 관점 수용
정치적 견해 자유롭게 토론할 수 있는 사회 조성
적절성과 부적절성에 대한 지침이 마련될 것으로 보입니다.
주커버그는 IPO를 한 2012년 이후 이번 5년만에 업 데이트 했습니다. 이번 그 내용은 다음과 같습니다.
출처: ZUCKERBERG FACEBOOK
To our community,
On our journey to connect the world, we often discuss products we're building and updates on our business. Today I want to focus on the most important question of all: are we building the world we all want?
History is the story of how we've learned to come together in ever greater numbers -- from tribes to cities to nations. At each step, we built social infrastructure like communities, media and governments to empower us to achieve things we couldn't on our own.
Today we are close to taking our next step. Our greatest opportunities are now global -- like spreading prosperity and freedom, promoting peace and understanding, lifting people out of poverty, and accelerating science. Our greatest challenges also need global responses -- like ending terrorism, fighting climate change, and preventing pandemics. Progress now requires humanity coming together not just as cities or nations, but also as a global community.
This is especially important right now. Facebook stands for bringing us closer together and building a global community. When we began, this idea was not controversial. Every year, the world got more connected and this was seen as a positive trend. Yet now, across the world there are people left behind by globalization, and movements for withdrawing from global connection. There are questions about whether we can make a global community that works for everyone, and whether the path ahead is to connect more or reverse course.
This is a time when many of us around the world are reflecting on how we can have the most positive impact. I am reminded of my favorite saying about technology: "We always overestimate what we can do in two years, and we underestimate what we can do in ten years." We may not have the power to create the world we want immediately, but we can all start working on the long term today. In times like these, the most important thing we at Facebook can do is develop the social infrastructure to give people the power to build a global community that works for all of us.
For the past decade, Facebook has focused on connecting friends and families. With that foundation, our next focus will be developing the social infrastructure for community -- for supporting us, for keeping us safe, for informing us, for civic engagement, and for inclusion of all.
Bringing us all together as a global community is a project bigger than any one organization or company, but Facebook can help contribute to answering these five important questions:
- How do we help people build supportive communities that strengthen traditional institutions in a world where membership in these institutions is declining?
- How do we help people build a safe community that prevents harm, helps during crises and rebuilds afterwards in a world where anyone across the world can affect us?
- How do we help people build an informed community that exposes us to new ideas and builds common understanding in a world where every person has a voice?
- How do we help people build a civically-engaged community in a world where participation in voting sometimes includes less than half our population?
- How do we help people build an inclusive community that reflects our collective values and common humanity from local to global levels, spanning cultures, nations and regions in a world with few examples of global communities?
My hope is that more of us will commit our energy to building the long term social infrastructure to bring humanity together. The answers to these questions won't all come from Facebook, but I believe we can play a role.
Our job at Facebook is to help people make the greatest positive impact while mitigating areas where technology and social media can contribute to divisiveness and isolation. Facebook is a work in progress, and we are dedicated to learning and improving. We take our responsibility seriously, and today I want to talk about how we plan to do our part to build this global community.
Supportive Communities
Building a global community that works for everyone starts with the millions of smaller communities and intimate social structures we turn to for our personal, emotional and spiritual needs.
Whether they're churches, sports teams, unions or other local groups, they all share important roles as social infrastructure for our communities. They provide all of us with a sense of purpose and hope; moral validation that we are needed and part of something bigger than ourselves; comfort that we are not alone and a community is looking out for us; mentorship, guidance and personal development; a safety net; values, cultural norms and accountability; social gatherings, rituals and a way to meet new people; and a way to pass time.
In our society, we have personal relationships with friends and family, and then we have institutional relationships with the governments that set the rules. A healthy society also has many layers of communities between us and government that take care of our needs. When we refer to our "social fabric", we usually mean the many mediating groups that bring us together and reinforce our values.
However, there has been a striking decline in the important social infrastructure of local communities over the past few decades. Since the 1970s, membership in some local groups has declined by as much as one-quarter, cutting across all segments of the population.
The decline raises deeper questions alongside surveys showing large percentages of our population lack a sense of hope for the future. It is possible many of our challenges are at least as much social as they are economic -- related to a lack of community and connection to something greater than ourselves. As one pastor told me: "People feel unsettled. A lot of what was settling in the past doesn't exist anymore."
Online communities are a bright spot, and we can strengthen existing physical communities by helping people come together online as well as offline. In the same way connecting with friends online strengthens real relationships, developing this infrastructure will strengthen these communities, as well as enable completely new ones to form.
A woman named Christina was diagnosed with a rare disorder called Epidermolysis Bullosa -- and now she's a member of a group that connects 2,400 people around the world so none of them have to suffer alone. A man named Matt was raising his two sons by himself and he started the Black Fathers group to help men share advice and encouragement as they raise their families. In San Diego, more than 4,000 military family members are part of a group that helps them make friends with other spouses. These communities don't just interact online. They hold get-togethers, organize dinners, and support each other in their daily lives.
We recently found that more than 100 million people on Facebook are members of what we call "very meaningful" groups. These are groups that upon joining, quickly become the most important part of our social network experience and an important part of our physical support structure. For example, many new parents tell us that joining a parenting group after having a child fits this purpose.
There is a real opportunity to connect more of us with groups that will be meaningful social infrastructure in our lives. More than one billion people are active members of Facebook groups, but most don't seek out groups on their own -- friends send invites or Facebook suggests them. If we can improve our suggestions and help connect one billion people with meaningful communities, that can strengthen our social fabric.
Going forward, we will measure Facebook's progress with groups based on meaningful groups, not groups overall. This will require not only helping people connect with existing meaningful groups, but also enabling community leaders to create more meaningful groups for people to connect with.
The most successful physical communities have engaged leaders, and we've seen the same with online groups as well. In Berlin, a man named Monis Bukhari runs a group where he personally helps refugees find homes and jobs. Today, Facebook's tools for group admins are relatively simple. We plan to build more tools to empower community leaders like Monis to run and grow their groups the way they'd like, similar to what we've done with Pages.
Most communities are made of many sub-communities, and this is another clear area for developing new tools. A school, for example, is not a single community, but many smaller groups among its classes, dorms and student groups. Just as the social fabric of society is made up of many communities, each community is made of many groups of personal connections. We plan to expand groups to support sub-communities.
We can look at many activities through the lens of building community. Watching video of our favorite sports team or TV show, reading our favorite newspaper, or playing our favorite game are not just entertainment or information but a shared experience and opportunity to bring together people who care about the same things. We can design these experiences not for passive consumption but for strengthening social connections.
Our goal is to strengthen existing communities by helping us come together online as well as offline, as well as enabling us to form completely new communities, transcending physical location. When we do this, beyond connecting online, we reinforce our physical communities by bringing us together in person to support each other.
A healthy society needs these communities to support our personal, emotional and spiritual needs. In a world where this physical social infrastructure has been declining, we have a real opportunity to help strengthen these communities and the social fabric of our society.
Safe Community
As we build a global community, this is a moment of truth. Our success isn't just based on whether we can capture videos and share them with friends. It's about whether we're building a community that helps keep us safe -- that prevents harm, helps during crises, and rebuilds afterwards.
Today's threats are increasingly global, but the infrastructure to protect us is not. Problems like terrorism, natural disasters, disease, refugee crises, and climate change need coordinated responses from a worldwide vantage point. No nation can solve them alone. A virus in one nation can quickly spread to others. A conflict in one country can create a refugee crisis across continents. Pollution in one place can affect the environment around the world. Humanity's current systems are insufficient to address these issues.
Many dedicated people join global non-profit organizations to help, but the market often fails to fund or incentivize building the necessary infrastructure. I have long expected more organizations and startups to build health and safety tools using technology, and I have been surprised by how little of what must be built has even been attempted. There is a real opportunity to build global safety infrastructure, and I have directed Facebook to invest more and more resources into serving this need.
For some of these problems, the Facebook community is in a unique position to help prevent harm, assist during a crisis, or come together to rebuild afterwards. This is because of the amount of communication across our network, our ability to quickly reach people worldwide in an emergency, and the vast scale of people's intrinsic goodness aggregated across our community.
To prevent harm, we can build social infrastructure to help our community identify problems before they happen. When someone is thinking of suicide or hurting themselves, we've built infrastructure to give their friends and community tools that could save their life. When a child goes missing, we've built infrastructure to show Amber Alerts -- and multiple children have been rescued without harm. And we've built infrastructure to work with public safety organizations around the world when we become aware of these issues. Going forward, there are even more cases where our community should be able to identify risks related to mental health, disease or crime.
To help during a crisis, we've built infrastructure like Safety Check so we can all let our friends know we're safe and check on friends who might be affected by an attack or natural disaster. Safety Check has been activated almost 500 times in two years and has already notified people that their families and friends are safe more than a billion times. When there is a disaster, governments often call us to make sure Safety Check has been activated in their countries. But there is more to build. We recently added tools to find and offer shelter, food and other resources during emergencies. Over time, our community should be able to help during wars and ongoing issues that are not limited to a single event.
To rebuild after a crisis, we've built the world's largest social infrastructure for collective action. A few years ago, after an earthquake in Nepal, the Facebook community raised $15 million to help people recover and rebuild -- which was the largest crowdfunded relief effort in history. We saw a similar effort after the shooting at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando when people across the country organized blood donations to help victims they had never met. Similarly, we built tools so millions of people could commit to becoming organ donors to save others after accidents, and registries reported larger boosts in sign ups than ever before.
Looking ahead, one of our greatest opportunities to keep people safe is building artificial intelligence to understand more quickly and accurately what is happening across our community.
There are billions of posts, comments and messages across our services each day, and since it's impossible to review all of them, we review content once it is reported to us. There have been terribly tragic events -- like suicides, some live streamed -- that perhaps could have been prevented if someone had realized what was happening and reported them sooner. There are cases of bullying and harassment every day, that our team must be alerted to before we can help out. These stories show we must find a way to do more.
Artificial intelligence can help provide a better approach. We are researching systems that can look at photos and videos to flag content our team should review. This is still very early in development, but we have started to have it look at some content, and it already generates about one-third of all reports to the team that reviews content for our community.
It will take many years to fully develop these systems. Right now, we're starting to explore ways to use AI to tell the difference between news stories about terrorism and actual terrorist propaganda so we can quickly remove anyone trying to use our services to recruit for a terrorist organization. This is technically difficult as it requires building AI that can read and understand news, but we need to work on this to help fight terrorism worldwide.
As we discuss keeping our community safe, it is important to emphasize that part of keeping people safe is protecting individual security and liberty. We are strong advocates of encryption and have built it into the largest messaging platforms in the world -- WhatsApp and Messenger. Keeping our community safe does not require compromising privacy. Since building end-to-end encryption into WhatsApp, we have reduced spam and malicious content by more than 75%.
The path forward is to recognize that a global community needs social infrastructure to keep us safe from threats around the world, and that our community is uniquely positioned to prevent disasters, help during crises, and rebuild afterwards. Keeping the global community safe is an important part of our mission -- and an important part of how we'll measure our progress going forward.
Informed Community
The purpose of any community is to bring people together to do things we couldn't do on our own. To do this, we need ways to share new ideas and share enough common understanding to actually work together.
Giving everyone a voice has historically been a very positive force for public discourse because it increases the diversity of ideas shared. But the past year has also shown it may fragment our shared sense of reality. It is our responsibility to amplify the good effects and mitigate the bad -- to continue increasing diversity while strengthening our common understanding so our community can create the greatest positive impact on the world.
The two most discussed concerns this past year were about diversity of viewpoints we see (filter bubbles) and accuracy of information (fake news). I worry about these and we have studied them extensively, but I also worry there are even more powerful effects we must mitigate around sensationalism and polarization leading to a loss of common understanding.
Social media already provides more diverse viewpoints than traditional media ever has. Even if most of our friends are like us, we all know people with different interests, beliefs and backgrounds who expose us to different perspectives. Compared with getting our news from the same two or three TV networks or reading the same newspapers with their consistent editorial views, our networks on Facebook show us more diverse content.
But our goal must be to help people see a more complete picture, not just alternate perspectives. We must be careful how we do this. Research shows that some of the most obvious ideas, like showing people an article from the opposite perspective, actually deepen polarization by framing other perspectives as foreign. A more effective approach is to show a range of perspectives, let people see where their views are on a spectrum and come to a conclusion on what they think is right. Over time, our community will identify which sources provide a complete range of perspectives so that content will naturally surface more.
Accuracy of information is very important. We know there is misinformation and even outright hoax content on Facebook, and we take this very seriously. We've made progress fighting hoaxes the way we fight spam, but we have more work to do. We are proceeding carefully because there is not always a clear line between hoaxes, satire and opinion. In a free society, it's important that people have the power to share their opinion, even if others think they're wrong. Our approach will focus less on banning misinformation, and more on surfacing additional perspectives and information, including that fact checkers dispute an item's accuracy.
While we have more work to do on information diversity and misinformation, I am even more focused on the impact of sensationalism and polarization, and the idea of building common understanding.
Social media is a short-form medium where resonant messages get amplified many times. This rewards simplicity and discourages nuance. At its best, this focuses messages and exposes people to different ideas. At its worst, it oversimplifies important topics and pushes us towards extremes.
Polarization exists in all areas of discourse, not just social media. It occurs in all groups and communities, including companies, classrooms and juries, and it's usually unrelated to politics. In the tech community, for example, discussion around AI has been oversimplified to existential fear-mongering. The harm is that sensationalism moves people away from balanced nuanced opinions towards polarized extremes.
If this continues and we lose common understanding, then even if we eliminated all misinformation, people would just emphasize different sets of facts to fit their polarized opinions. That's why I'm so worried about sensationalism in media.
Fortunately, there are clear steps we can take to correct these effects. For example, we noticed some people share stories based on sensational headlines without ever reading the story. In general, if you become less likely to share a story after reading it, that's a good sign the headline was sensational. If you're more likely to share a story after reading it, that's often a sign of good in-depth content. We recently started reducing sensationalism in News Feed by taking this into account for pieces of content, and going forward signals like this will identify sensational publishers as well. There are many steps like this we have taken and will keep taking to reduce sensationalism and help build a more informed community.
Research suggests the best solutions for improving discourse may come from getting to know each other as whole people instead of just opinions -- something Facebook may be uniquely suited to do. If we connect with people about what we have in common -- sports teams, TV shows, interests -- it is easier to have dialogue about what we disagree on. When we do this well, we give billions of people the ability to share new perspectives while mitigating the unwanted effects that come with any new medium.
A strong news industry is also critical to building an informed community. Giving people a voice is not enough without having people dedicated to uncovering new information and analyzing it. There is more we must do to support the news industry to make sure this vital social function is sustainable -- from growing local news, to developing formats best suited to mobile devices, to improving the range of business models news organizations rely on.
Connecting everyone to the internet is also necessary for building an informed community. For the majority of people around the world, the debate is not about the quality of public discourse but whether they have access to basic information they need at all, often related to health, education and jobs.
Finally, I want to emphasize that the vast majority of conversations on Facebook are social, not ideological. They're friends sharing jokes and families staying in touch across cities. They're people finding groups, whether they're new parents raising kids or newly diagnosed patients suffering from a disease together. Sometimes it's for joy, coming together around religion or sports. And sometimes it's for survival, like refugees communicating to find shelter.
Whatever your situation when you enter our community, our commitment is to continue improving our tools to give you the power to share your experience. By increasing the diversity of our ideas and strengthening our common understanding, our community can have the greatest positive impact on the world.
Civically-Engaged Community
Our society will reflect our collective values only if we engage in the civic process and participate in self-governance. There are two distinct types of social infrastructure that must be built:
The first encourages engagement in existing political processes: voting, engaging with issues and representatives, speaking out, and sometimes organizing. Only through dramatically greater engagement can we ensure these political processes reflect our values.
The second is establishing a new process for citizens worldwide to participate in collective decision-making. Our world is more connected than ever, and we face global problems that span national boundaries. As the largest global community, Facebook can explore examples of how community governance might work at scale.
The starting point for civic engagement in the existing political process is to support voting across the world. It is striking that only about half of Americans eligible to vote participate in elections. This is low compared to other countries, but democracy is receding in many countries and there is a large opportunity across the world to encourage civic participation.
In the United States election last year, we helped more than 2 million people register to vote and then go vote. This was among the largest voter turnout efforts in history, and larger than those of both major parties combined. In every election around the world, we keep improving our tools to help more people register and vote, and we hope to eventually enable hundreds of millions of more people to vote in elections than do today, in every democratic country around the world.
Local civic engagement is a big opportunity as well as national. Today, most of us do not even know who our local representatives are, but many policies impacting our lives are local, and this is where our participation has the greatest influence. Research suggests reading local news is directly correlated with local civic engagement. This shows how building an informed community, supportive local communities, and a civically-engaged community are all related.
Beyond voting, the greatest opportunity is helping people stay engaged with the issues that matter to them every day, not just every few years at the ballot box. We can help establish direct dialogue and accountability between people and our elected leaders. In India, Prime Minister Modi has asked his ministers to share their meetings and information on Facebook so they can hear direct feedback from citizens. In Kenya, whole villages are in WhatsApp groups together, including their representatives. In recent campaigns around the world -- from India and Indonesia across Europe to the United States -- we've seen the candidate with the largest and most engaged following on Facebook usually wins. Just as TV became the primary medium for civic communication in the 1960s, social media is becoming this in the 21st century.
This creates an opportunity for us to connect with our representatives at all levels. In the last few months, we have already helped our community double the number of connections between people and our representatives by making it easier to connect with all our representatives in one click. When we connect, we can engage directly in comments and messages. For example, in Iceland, it's common to tag politicians in group discussions so they can take community issues to parliament.
Sometimes people must speak out and demonstrate for what they believe is right. From Tahrir Square to the Tea Party -- our community organizes these demonstrations using our infrastructure for events and groups. On a daily basis, people use their voices to share their views in ways that can spread around the world and grow into movements. The Women's March is an example of this, where a grandmother with an internet connection wrote a post that led her friends to start a Facebook event that eventually turned into millions of people marching in cities around the world.
Giving people a voice is a principle our community has been committed to since we began. As we look ahead to building the social infrastructure for a global community, we will work on building new tools that encourage thoughtful civic engagement. Empowering us to use our voices will only become more important.
Inclusive Community
Building an inclusive global community requires establishing a new process for citizens worldwide to participate in community governance. I hope that we can explore examples of how collective decision-making might work at scale.
Facebook is not just technology or media, but a community of people. That means we need Community Standards that reflect our collective values for what should and should not be allowed.
In the last year, the complexity of the issues we've seen has outstripped our existing processes for governing the community. We saw this in errors taking down newsworthy videos related to Black Lives Matter and police violence, and in removing the historical Terror of War photo from Vietnam. We've seen this in misclassifying hate speech in political debates in both directions -- taking down accounts and content that should be left up and leaving up content that was hateful and should be taken down. Both the number of issues and their cultural importance has increased recently.
This has been painful for me because I often agree with those criticizing us that we're making mistakes. These mistakes are almost never because we hold ideological positions at odds with the community, but instead are operational scaling issues. Our guiding philosophy for the Community Standards is to try to reflect the cultural norms of our community. When in doubt, we always favor giving people the power to share more.
There are a few reasons for the increase in issues we've seen: cultural norms are shifting, cultures are different around the world, and people are sensitive to different things.
First, our community is evolving from its origin connecting us with family and friends to now becoming a source of news and public discourse as well. With this cultural shift, our Community Standards must adapt to permit more newsworthy and historical content, even if some is objectionable. For example, an extremely violent video of someone dying would have been marked as disturbing and taken down. However, now that we use Live to capture the news and we post videos to protest violence, our standards must adapt. Similarly, a photo depicting any child nudity would have always been taken down -- and for good reason -- but we've now adapted our standards to allow historically important content like the Terror of War photo. These issues reflect a need to update our standards to meet evolving expectations from our community.
Second, our community spans many countries and cultures, and the norms are different in each region. It's not surprising that Europeans more frequently find fault with taking down images depicting nudity, since some European cultures are more accepting of nudity than, for example, many communities in the Middle East or Asia. With a community of almost two billion people, it is less feasible to have a single set of standards to govern the entire community so we need to evolve towards a system of more local governance.
Third, even within a given culture, we have different opinions on what we want to see and what is objectionable. I may be okay with more politically charged speech but not want to see anything sexually suggestive, while you may be okay with nudity but not want to see offensive speech. Similarly, you may want to share a violent video in a protest without worrying that you're going to bother friends who don't want to see it. And just as it's a bad experience to see objectionable content, it's also a terrible experience to be told we can't share something we feel is important. This suggests we need to evolve towards a system of personal control over our experience.
Fourth, we're operating at such a large scale that even a small percent of errors causes a large number of bad experiences. We review over one hundred million pieces of content every month, and even if our reviewers get 99% of the calls right, that's still millions of errors over time. Any system will always have some mistakes, but I believe we can do better than we are today.
I've spent a lot of time over the past year reflecting on how we can improve our community governance. Sitting here in California, we're not best positioned to identify the cultural norms around the world. Instead, we need a system where we can all contribute to setting the standards. Although this system is not fully developed, I want to share an idea of how this might work.
The guiding principles are that the Community Standards should reflect the cultural norms of our community, that each person should see as little objectionable content as possible, and each person should be able to share what they want while being told they cannot share something as little as possible. The approach is to combine creating a large-scale democratic process to determine standards with AI to help enforce them.
The idea is to give everyone in the community options for how they would like to set the content policy for themselves. Where is your line on nudity? On violence? On graphic content? On profanity? What you decide will be your personal settings. We will periodically ask you these questions to increase participation and so you don't need to dig around to find them. For those who don't make a decision, the default will be whatever the majority of people in your region selected, like a referendum. Of course you will always be free to update your personal settings anytime.
With a broader range of controls, content will only be taken down if it is more objectionable than the most permissive options allow. Within that range, content should simply not be shown to anyone whose personal controls suggest they would not want to see it, or at least they should see a warning first. Although we will still block content based on standards and local laws, our hope is that this system of personal controls and democratic referenda should minimize restrictions on what we can share.
It's worth noting that major advances in AI are required to understand text, photos and videos to judge whether they contain hate speech, graphic violence, sexually explicit content, and more. At our current pace of research, we hope to begin handling some of these cases in 2017, but others will not be possible for many years.
Overall, it is important that the governance of our community scales with the complexity and demands of its people. We are committed to always doing better, even if that involves building a worldwide voting system to give you more voice and control. Our hope is that this model provides examples of how collective decision-making may work in other aspects of the global community.
This is an important time in the development of our global community, and it's a time when many of us around the world are reflecting on how we can have the most positive impact.
History has had many moments like today. As we've made our great leaps from tribes to cities to nations, we have always had to build social infrastructure like communities, media and governments for us to thrive and reach the next level. At each step we learned how to come together to solve our challenges and accomplish greater things than we could alone. We have done it before and we will do it again.
I am reminded of President Lincoln's remarks during the American Civil War: "We can succeed only by concert. It is not 'can any of us imagine better?' but, 'can we all do better?' The dogmas of the quiet past, are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew, act anew."
There are many of us who stand for bringing people together and connecting the world. I hope we have the focus to take the long view and build the new social infrastructure to create the world we want for generations to come.
It's an honor to be on this journey with you. Thank you for being part of this community, and thanks for everything you do to make the world more open and connected.
'[TS] 일상다반사' 카테고리의 다른 글
| 임차주택의 경매 시 기간만료 전 임차인의 배당요구권 (0) | 2017.02.26 |
|---|---|
| 화웨이의 음성비서 (0) | 2017.02.20 |
| 구글에서 인터넷 풍선을 띄웁니다. (0) | 2017.02.20 |
| 국내 동영상 광고시장 구글, 페이스북이 독점 (0) | 2017.02.20 |
| 개인정보수집이용동의서 작성가이드 (0) | 2017.02.19 |
구글에서 인터넷 풍선을 띄웁니다.
- 구글에서 인터넷 풍선을 띄우기 시작했습니다.
- AI 바람으로 예측을 한다는 얘기인데요,
- 파이낸셜타임즈DP eKFMAUS 풍선 인터넷이 필 요한 특정지역으로 오래 머물도록 계획됐습니다.
- 관련된 동영상은 다음과 같습니다
- 머신러닝 때문에 풍선 움직임을 예측하기 쉬워 졌 기 때문에 이러한 인터넷이 잘되는 풍선을 뛸 수 있게 됐구요
- 구글 지난 페루 실험에서 풍선을 3개월 동안 한자리 줄 수도 있었습니다.
- 페이스 북은 반면에 드론으로 인터넷서비스를 하려고 시도 중입니다.
TS Comment:
우리나라에서도 이런 혁신적인 기업이 나오기를 기대해봅니다.
관련링크:
인터넷 가입 권유 전화는 적법한 것이 아닐 수 있습니다.
'[TS] 일상다반사' 카테고리의 다른 글
| 화웨이의 음성비서 (0) | 2017.02.20 |
|---|---|
| 주커버그가 꿈꾸는 새로운 미래 (0) | 2017.02.20 |
| 국내 동영상 광고시장 구글, 페이스북이 독점 (0) | 2017.02.20 |
| 개인정보수집이용동의서 작성가이드 (0) | 2017.02.19 |
| ｢표준 개인정보보호 지침(고시)｣ (0) | 2017.02.19 |
국내 동영상 광고시장 구글, 페이스북이 독점
http://www.ddaily.co.kr/news/article.html?no=152944
- 국내 동영상 광고시장은 구글, 페이스북이 대부분을 차지하고 있다는 기사입니다.
- 네이버, 다음이 그 다음 순위를 차지하고 있으나 유투브, 페이스북의 매출의 2.5배보다 낮습니다.
- 최근 언급드린 대로 페이스북도 동영상 시장에 적극 진출예정이라, 역차별문제가 발생할 수 있어보입니다.
관련링크:
'[TS] 일상다반사' 카테고리의 다른 글
| 주커버그가 꿈꾸는 새로운 미래 (0) | 2017.02.20 |
|---|---|
| 구글에서 인터넷 풍선을 띄웁니다. (0) | 2017.02.20 |
| 개인정보수집이용동의서 작성가이드 (0) | 2017.02.19 |
| ｢표준 개인정보보호 지침(고시)｣ (0) | 2017.02.19 |
| 개인정보 침해신고센터 신고 및 상담접수 현황 (0) | 2017.02.19 |
개인정보수집이용동의서 작성가이드
개인정보수집이용동의서 작성 가이드입니다.
동의서 작성시 참고하시기 바랍니다.
출처: 개인정보보호 종합포털
관련링크:
개인정보보호법 집단소송제도 도입의 건(이학영 의원 대표발의)
레스토랑에서 수집한 개인정보는 어떻게 되었을까? 개업안내문자를 알아보자.
'[TS] 일상다반사' 카테고리의 다른 글
| 구글에서 인터넷 풍선을 띄웁니다. (0) | 2017.02.20 |
|---|---|
| 국내 동영상 광고시장 구글, 페이스북이 독점 (0) | 2017.02.20 |
| ｢표준 개인정보보호 지침(고시)｣ (0) | 2017.02.19 |
| 개인정보 침해신고센터 신고 및 상담접수 현황 (0) | 2017.02.19 |
| 인권위에서 사업장 전자감시에 대한 근로자의 개인정보보호 결정문이 나왔습니다. (0) | 2017.02.19 |
｢표준 개인정보보호 지침(고시)｣
행자부의 고시인 표준 개인정보보호지침입니다.
업무에 참고하시기 바랍니다.
관련링크:
개인정보에 접근할 수 있는 상태에 놓여 있었다는 사정만으로 개인정보가 누출되었다고 볼 수는 없다.
'[TS] 일상다반사' 카테고리의 다른 글
| 국내 동영상 광고시장 구글, 페이스북이 독점 (0) | 2017.02.20 |
|---|---|
| 개인정보수집이용동의서 작성가이드 (0) | 2017.02.19 |
| 개인정보 침해신고센터 신고 및 상담접수 현황 (0) | 2017.02.19 |
| 인권위에서 사업장 전자감시에 대한 근로자의 개인정보보호 결정문이 나왔습니다. (0) | 2017.02.19 |
| 서울남부지법 개인 정보 유출' 롯데카드 피해자에 10만원씩 배상하라 판결하다. (0) | 2017.02.19 |
개인정보 침해신고센터 신고 및 상담접수 현황
개인정보 침해신고센터 신고 및 상담접수 현황
2016년 월별 개인정보 접수유형 분석
|
접 수 유 형 |
1월 |
2월 |
3월 |
4월 |
5월 |
6월 |
7월 |
8월 |
9월 |
10월 |
11월 |
12월 |
합계 |
|
이용자의 동의 없는 개인정보 수집 |
199 |
271 |
607 |
355 |
163 |
148 |
175 |
141 |
112 |
|
|
|
2,171 |
|
개인정보 수집시 고지 또는 명시 의무 불이행 |
2 |
2 |
13 |
14 |
4 |
6 |
0 |
4 |
6 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
과도한 개인정보 수집 |
42 |
20 |
28 |
29 |
32 |
39 |
39 |
15 |
28 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
목적 외 이용 또는 제3자 제공 |
233 |
232 |
287 |
270 |
258 |
245 |
295 |
238 |
258 |
|
|
|
2,316 |
|
개인정보 취급자에 의한 훼손ㆍ침해 등 |
49 |
56 |
68 |
42 |
66 |
47 |
76 |
43 |
43 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
개인정보 처리 위탁시 고지의무 불이행 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
영업의 양수 등의 통지의무 불이행 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
개인정보관리책임자 미지정 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
5 |
8 |
11 |
14 |
33 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
기술적ㆍ관리적 조치 미비 관련 |
234 |
178 |
209 |
251 |
198 |
226 |
417 |
269 |
138 |
|
|
|
2,120 |
|
수집 또는 제공받은 목적 달성 후 개인정보 미파기 |
33 |
23 |
55 |
40 |
56 |
62 |
47 |
50 |
36 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
동의철회ㆍ열람 또는 정정 요구 불응 |
59 |
82 |
90 |
55 |
79 |
102 |
79 |
69 |
47 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
동의철회, 열람ㆍ정정을 수집보다 쉽게 해야 할 조치 미이행 |
33 |
29 |
31 |
30 |
20 |
24 |
44 |
29 |
12 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
아동의 개인정보 수집 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
주민등록번호 등 타인 정보의 훼손ㆍ침해ㆍ도용 |
4,230 |
2,922 |
4,427 |
3,399 |
3,860 |
4,031 |
4,051 |
4,103 |
3,647 |
|
|
|
34,670 |
|
정보통신망법 적용대상 외 관련(신용정보 관련 문의 등) |
3,753 |
3,298 |
4,475 |
3,779 |
3,507 |
3,710 |
3,001 |
3,004 |
2,388 |
|
|
|
30,915 |
|
합 계 |
8,876 |
7,119 |
10,302 |
8,283 |
8,253 |
8,656 |
8,244 |
7,989 |
6,754 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
74,476 |
출처: 개인정보종합포털
개인정보침해신고센터 신고 및 상담접수 현황(2016.9).hwp
TS Comment:
이용자의 동의 없는 수집, 목적외 이용 또는 제3자 제공, 기술적/관리적 조치 미비가 다수입니다.
관련링크:
개인정보보호법 집단소송제도 도입의 건(이학영 의원 대표발의)
레스토랑에서 수집한 개인정보는 어떻게 되었을까? 개업안내문자를 알아보자.
개인정보가 포함된 행정심판 답변서 송달의 경우 인권침해 가능성이 있다.
'[TS] 일상다반사' 카테고리의 다른 글
| 개인정보수집이용동의서 작성가이드 (0) | 2017.02.19 |
|---|---|
| ｢표준 개인정보보호 지침(고시)｣ (0) | 2017.02.19 |
| 인권위에서 사업장 전자감시에 대한 근로자의 개인정보보호 결정문이 나왔습니다. (0) | 2017.02.19 |
| 서울남부지법 개인 정보 유출' 롯데카드 피해자에 10만원씩 배상하라 판결하다. (0) | 2017.02.19 |
| 인터넷 가입 권유 전화는 적법한 것이 아닐 수 있습니다. (0) | 2017.02.17 |
인권위에서 사업장 전자감시에 대한 근로자의 개인정보보호 결정문이 나왔습니다.
인권위에서 사업장 전자감시에 대한 근로자의 개인정보보호 결정문이 나왔습니다.
인권위, 사업장 전자감시로부터 근로자 개인정보 보호해야
- 고용노동부 장관에게, 권리고지 등 근로자 권리보호 강화 권고 -
170216 결정문 (사업장 전자감시 제도개선 권고).pdf
170216 보도자료 (인권위 사업장 전자감시로부터 근로자 개인정보 보호해야).hwp
o 국가인권위원회(위원장 이성호)는 고용노동부장관에게 근로자의 정보인권 보호를 위해 ？개인정보 보호 가이드라인[인사？노무편]？에 근로자의 권리 보호 등에 관한 사항을 구체적으로 보완할 것을 권고했다.
o ？개인정보 보호법？에 따르면 개인정보를 수집？이용하려면 원칙적으로 정보주체 동의를 받아야 하고, 목적에 필요한 최소한의 개인정보만을 수집해야 한다. 그러나 인권위에 제기된 진정？민원·언론보도 등에 따르면, 사업장에서 작업 상황 및 근로자 행동을 모니터링·감시할 목적으로 전자장비를 설치？운영하면서 근로자의 고지？동의 절차를 받지 않거나 본래 설치목적과 다른 용도로 사용하는 사례가 다수 있었다.
o 또한 2013년 인권위가 실시한 ？정보통신기기에 의한 노동인권 침해 실태조사？에 따르면, 사업장 전자감시로 인해 자신의 개인정보가 침해되어도 이를 공식적으로 문제 제기하는 경우는 응답자의 28.4%에 불과한 것으로 나타났다. ？개인정보보호법？에 따른 개인정보침해 신고센터가 운영되고 있다는 사실을 아는 경우도 29.4%에 그쳤고,비정규직, 소규모 사업장, 노동조합 미결성 사업장 근로자는 인지도가 더욱 낮았다.
o 인권위는 사용자가 전자감시를 통해 근로자의 개인정보를 수집？이용할 때 ？개인정보 보호법？을 철저히 준수하도록 정부가 지도？감독하고, 근로자가 개인정보와 관련된 권리와 구제 방법 등을 명확히 알 수 있도록 하는 것이 바람직하다고 판단하였다.
o 이에 인권위는 고용노동부와 행정자치부가 2012년 제정한 ？개인정보보호 가이드라인[인사？노무편]？에 사업장 전자감시의 주요 유형별 개인정보 처리의 요건 및 절차, 근로자의 권리 보호 등에 관한 사항을 구체적으로 명시하도록 가이드라인을 보완할 것을 권고하였다.
o 인권위는 2007년‘사업장 전자감시에서 근로자의 인권보호를 위한 법령·제도 개선 권고’를 통해 사업장 전자감시를 적극 규제할 수 있는 별도의 법률 마련, 근로관계 법률상 전자감시에 대한 절차적 통제 강화 등을 권고한 바 있다.
o 이번 권고는 2011년 「개인정보보호법」 제정 등 변화된 환경 속에서 사업장 전자감시로부터 근로자의 정보인권이 보다 충실하게 보호될 수 있도록 개선방안을 제시한 것이다.
※ 사업장 전자 감시의 유형
|
- 폐쇄 회로 텔레비전(CCTV) 등 영상 정보 처리기기에 의한 감시 - 위치확인 시스템(Global Positioning System, GPS) 등에 의한 감시 지문·홍채·정맥 등 바이오(생체)정보 처리기기에 의한 감시 업무용 사내 시스템(Enterprise Resources Planning, ERP )을 활용한 감시 |
붙임. 결정문 끝.
'[TS] 일상다반사' 카테고리의 다른 글
| ｢표준 개인정보보호 지침(고시)｣ (0) | 2017.02.19 |
|---|---|
| 개인정보 침해신고센터 신고 및 상담접수 현황 (0) | 2017.02.19 |
| 서울남부지법 개인 정보 유출' 롯데카드 피해자에 10만원씩 배상하라 판결하다. (0) | 2017.02.19 |
| 인터넷 가입 권유 전화는 적법한 것이 아닐 수 있습니다. (0) | 2017.02.17 |
| 개인정보처리하거나 처리하였던자의 범위 (0) | 2017.02.17 |
서울남부지법 개인 정보 유출' 롯데카드 피해자에 10만원씩 배상하라 판결하다.
오늘은 롯데카드 사건 뉴스를 알아봅니다.
- 서울 남부지법 민사합의 16부는 롯데카드는 원고3천570명에게 각 10만원씩 배상하라고 선고했습니다.
- 2014년 KB국민카드, NH 농협카드, 롯데카드는 1억 400만건의 개인정보 유출 사건이 있었습니다.
- 재판부는 2010년 유출건에 대한 피해는 인정하되, 2013년 건에 대해서는 인정할 수 없다고 판단했습니다.
(2013년 정보는 유통되지 않고 압수되었습니다)
출처: http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=101&oid=001&aid=0009040174
관련링크:
'[TS] 일상다반사' 카테고리의 다른 글
| 개인정보 침해신고센터 신고 및 상담접수 현황 (0) | 2017.02.19 |
|---|---|
| 인권위에서 사업장 전자감시에 대한 근로자의 개인정보보호 결정문이 나왔습니다. (0) | 2017.02.19 |
| 인터넷 가입 권유 전화는 적법한 것이 아닐 수 있습니다. (0) | 2017.02.17 |
| 개인정보처리하거나 처리하였던자의 범위 (0) | 2017.02.17 |
| 개인정보보호법 집단소송제도 도입의 건(이학영 의원 대표발의) (0) | 2017.02.17 |
인터넷 가입 권유 전화는 적법한 것이 아닐 수 있습니다.
최근 보이스피싱은 물론 다이렉트마케팅이 활성화 되고 있습니다.
이에 대한 대응조치를 알아봅니다.
질문
인터넷 가입센터라는 곳에서 인터넷 가입 권유 전화를 받았습니다.
본인들은 인터넷 가입을 대행해주는 ◯◯텔레콤 가입센터라면서 기존에 쓰고 있는
인터넷 서비스에 대해 업그레이드를 하라는 전화를 받았습니다. ◯◯텔레콤 가입센터
에서 먼저 저의 이름과 저희 집 인터넷 가입년도, 회선 수 등을 말하였고, 저희 집 주
소도 알고 있었습니다. 저의 개인정보를 어떻게 알고 있냐고 물었지만 ◯◯텔레콤 가
입센터에서는 정확한 출처는 얼버무리며 전화통화를 종료하는데 급급했습니다. 이
런 경우, 제가 취해야할 조치가 무엇인지 궁금합니다.
답변
개인정보 수집 출처 고지를 요구할 수 있으며, 개인정보 파기 요청을 할 수 있습니다.
인터넷 혹은 이동통신사라고 하며 상담사가 직접 육성으로 가입 권유전화를 한다면 텔
레마케팅으로 볼 수 있습니다. 이와 관련하여 통신사가 고객의 동의를 받고 직접 또는
위탁하여 신규 요금제 또는 서비스 안내 등을 전화로 광고하는 행위는 허용될 수 있습
니다. 그러나 인터넷통신서비스 관련 불법텔레마케팅은 보유하고 있는 개인정보를 고
객 동의 없이 이용하거나 통신사의 대리점(혹은 판매점)에서 불법적으로 수집(구매)한
개인정보를 활용하는 경우가 있습니다. 대리점(혹은 판매점)인 경우 소속, 직급을 문
의하였을 때 대답을 회피하거나 발신전용번호 또는 휴대전화번호로 광고를 한다면 불
법 텔레마케팅을 의심할 수 있습니다.
이 사례의 경우, ◯◯텔레콤 가입센터에 정보주체의 개인정보를 어떻게 수집하였는지
개인정보 수집 출처 고지를 요구하였지만 ◯◯텔레콤 가입센터이 이에 대한 적절한 답
변을 하지 않았으므로 과태료가 부과될 수 있습니다. ◯◯텔레콤 가입센터는 정보주체
의 개인정보 수집 출처 요구에 법에 정한 고지 내용을 알려줘야할 의무가 있기 때문입
니다. 또한, ◯◯텔레콤 가입센터는 인터넷 서비스를 제공하기 위해 수집한 개인정보
를 별도의 마케팅 목적으로 사용하고자 한다면, 정보주체에게 별도로 마케팅 목적으로
개인정보를 사용해도 되는지를 법에 정한 고지 항목을 알리고 동의를 받아서 이용해야
하며, 이를 위반할 경우, 형사처벌을 받을 수도 있습니다.
관련 법규
「개인정보 보호법」
제20조(정보주체 이외로부터 수집한 개인정보의 수집 출처 등 고지)
① 개인정보처리자가 정보주체 이외로부터 수집한 개인정보를 처리하는 때에는 정보주체의 요구가 있으
면 즉시 다음 각 호의 모든 사항을 정보주체에게 알려야 한다.
1. 개인정보의 수집 출처
2. 개인정보의 처리 목적
3. 제37조에 따른 개인정보 처리의 정지를 요구할 권리가 있다는 사실
② 제1항에도 불구하고 처리하는 개인정보의 종류·규모, 종업원 수 및 매출액 규모 등을 고려하여 대통
령령으로 정하는 기준에 해당하는 개인정보처리자가 제17조제1항제1호에 따라 정보주체 이외로부터 개
인정보를 수집하여 처리하는 때에는 제1항 각 호의 모든 사항을 정보주체에게 알려야 한다. 다만, 개인
정보처리자가 수집한 정보에 연락처 등 정보주체에게 알릴 수 있는 개인정보가 포함되지 아니한 경우에
는 그러하지 아니하다.
제37조(개인정보의 처리정지 등)
① 정보주체는 개인정보처리자에 대하여 자신의 개인정보 처리의 정지를 요구할 수 있다. 이 경우 공공
기관에 대하여는 제32조에 따라 등록 대상이 되는 개인정보파일 중 자신의 개인정보에 대한 처리의 정
지를 요구할 수 있다.
② 개인정보처리자는 제1항에 따른 요구를 받았을 때에는 지체 없이 정보주체의 요구에 따라 개인정보
처리의 전부를 정지하거나 일부를 정지하여야 한다.
제73조(벌칙)
다음 각 호의 어느 하나에 해당하는 자는 2년 이하의 징역 또는 2천만원 이하의 벌금에 처한다.
3. 제37조제2항을 위반하여 개인정보의 처리를 정지하지 아니하고 계속 이용하거나 제3자에게 제공
한 자
제75조(과태료)
② 다음 각 호의 어느 하나에 해당하는 자에게는 3천만원 이하의 과태료를 부과한다.
3. 제20조제1항 또는 제2항을 위반하여 정보주체에게 같은 항 각 호의 사실을 알리지 아니한 자
12. 제37조제4항을 위반하여 처리가 정지된 개인정보에 대하여 파기 등 필요한 조치를 하지 아니한 자
정보통신망법
제50조(영리목적의 광고성 정보 전송 제한)
① 누구든지 전자적 전송매체를 이용하여 영리목적의 광고성 정보를 전송하려면 그 수신자의 명시적인
사전 동의를 받아야 한다. 다만, 다음 각 호의 어느 하나에 해당하는 경우에는 사전 동의를 받지 아니
한다.
1. 재화등의 거래관계를 통하여 수신자로부터 직접 연락처를 수집한 자가 대통령령으로 정한 기간 이내
에 자신이 처리하고 수신자와 거래한 것과 동종의 재화등에 대한 영리목적의 광고성 정보를 전송하려
는 경우
2. 「방문판매 등에 관한 법률」에 따른 전화권유판매자가 육성으로 수신자에게 개인정보의 수집출처를 고
지하고 전화권유를 하는 경우
② 전자적 전송매체를 이용하여 영리목적의 광고성 정보를 전송하려는 자는 제1항에도 불구하고 수신자
가 수신거부의사를 표시하거나 사전 동의를 철회한 경우에는 영리목적의 광고성 정보를 전송하여서는
아니 된다.
출처: KISA, 개인정보보호 상담사례집
관련링크:
'[TS] 일상다반사' 카테고리의 다른 글
| 인권위에서 사업장 전자감시에 대한 근로자의 개인정보보호 결정문이 나왔습니다. (0) | 2017.02.19 |
|---|---|
| 서울남부지법 개인 정보 유출' 롯데카드 피해자에 10만원씩 배상하라 판결하다. (0) | 2017.02.19 |
| 개인정보처리하거나 처리하였던자의 범위 (0) | 2017.02.17 |
| 개인정보보호법 집단소송제도 도입의 건(이학영 의원 대표발의) (0) | 2017.02.17 |
| 챗봇 시장 활성화 (0) | 2017.02.17 |